Shared custody and child support in 2026 – what does the court consider?

Shared custody increasingly appears in conversations between parents after separation. For some, it is an opportunity for the child to maintain a close relationship with both mother and father. For others, it is a source of stress, fearing the child will be constantly moving and the entire arrangement will be used merely to reduce child support.

The most emotionally charged question usually is: does shared custody require paying child support?

The answer is not as simple as often presented online. Shared custody does not automatically mean there is no child support. Nor does it automatically mean that child support remains the same as in the traditional model, where the child primarily lives with one parent. Everything depends on how the custody actually works, the child's expenses, the parents' incomes, and whether this model serves the child’s best interests.

In family matters, the most important issue should not be which parent “wins” custody or who pays less. The child is paramount: their safety, schooling, daily routine, relationships, medical care, activities, rest, and everyday life. Only against this background can financial matters be sensibly discussed.

If the matter concerns a specific dispute, it is advisable to first check how Syndykat Prawniczy describes shared custody, maintenance and broader issues in family law. These topics often go hand in hand, especially in divorce, parental separation, or disputes over the child's residence.

What is shared custody?

Shared custody is a model where the child spends a comparable amount of time with each parent. Most commonly, it is described as one week with the mother and one week with the father, but various arrangements are possible in practice. Sometimes the child stays with one parent from Monday to Thursday and with the other from Thursday to Sunday. Sometimes the model is more flexible and adapted to the parents’ work schedules, the child’s school, or the distance between homes.

It is not just about the name. The most important aspect is how custody works in practice.

Shared custody should mean real involvement of both parents in the child’s life. Not just picking up the child for overnight stays, but also school, doctors, lessons, clothing, food, extracurricular activities, emotions, illnesses, parent-teacher meetings, daily duties, and decision-making.

If the child is formally supposed to be “equally” with both parents, but one parent does not know the class schedule, does not attend medical appointments, does not help with homework, does not pay for the child’s needs, and treats custody mainly as an argument in a child support dispute, the court may view such a model cautiously.

On the other hand, if both parents have long been involved, live nearby, can cooperate, and the child functions well in this rhythm, shared custody may be a solution worth considering.

Why does shared custody cause so many disputes?

Because it touches on two very sensitive issues at once: the child and money.

For one parent, shared custody may mean a fair division of daily responsibility. For the other, it may seem like an attempt to avoid paying child support. Sometimes concerns are exaggerated, but sometimes they are well-founded.

In practice, conflicts vary.

One parent says:

“I want to have the child half the time because I am their parent and want to participate in their life.”

The other responds:

“You hardly cared before, and now you want shared custody just to avoid paying child support.”

Or vice versa:

“I have cared for the child for years, and the other parent wants to reduce me to weekends.”

The other side replies:

“You don’t let me be a parent, and then you claim I am not involved.”

Such disputes are difficult because each side may have some truth. The court must then distinguish genuine concern for the child from adult conflicts. Therefore, mere declarations are insufficient. What matters is how custody has worked so far and whether the proposed model will be good for the child.

Shared custody and child support – where does the problem come from?

The problem arises from a simple assumption often made between parents: since the child spends half the time with the mother and half with the father, no one pays anything to the other.

However, a child’s life rarely divides perfectly in half.

Even with shared custody, there may be costs borne mainly by one parent, for example:

• school
• kindergarten
• tutoring
• medical treatment
• therapy
• phone
• extracurricular activities
• insurance
• larger purchases
• seasonal clothing
• holidays
• transport
• document fees
• learning equipment

Additionally, parents may have completely different incomes. If one earns much more and the other much less, the absence of any child support can mean that the child lives at two entirely different standards. With one parent, the child has everything; with the other, there is a lack of money for basic needs.

Therefore, child support in shared custody must be assessed reasonably. Not by the slogan "half and half," but by the facts.

The basis is art. 135 of the Family and Guardianship Code. The provision indicates that the scope of child support depends on the justified needs of the child and the earning and financial capabilities of the obligated parent. The official text of the act can be checked in the Internet System of Legal Acts of the Sejm: Family and Guardianship Code - ISAP.

This means that the court should not look only at the number of days spent with the child. It must also consider the child's needs, the parents' capabilities, and the actual division of costs.

Does child support always disappear with shared custody?

No. This is one of the biggest myths.

Shared custody may affect child support but does not automatically eliminate it. Sometimes, child support will indeed not exist in the classic form if the parents have similar incomes, share custody similarly, and bear costs similarly. Sometimes, child support will be lower than in a model where the child lives mainly with one parent. But sometimes, child support will still be necessary.

This may be especially true when:

• one parent earns significantly more
• one parent bears most of the fixed costs
• the child has special needs
• shared custody is not perfectly equal
• one parent pays for school, medical treatment, or activities
• the other parent does not contribute to costs beyond the time the child is with them
• the child is to have a similar standard of living in both homes
• one parent formally wants shared custody but in fact does not have the conditions to implement it

Child support is not a punishment for a parent. Nor is it a gift for the other parent. It is money for the child. If the child needs regular financial support and costs are not fairly distributed, child support may be justified even with shared custody.

When can shared custody work well?

Shared custody requires more than just a court order or parental consent. It is a model that must function in everyday life.

It usually makes sense when:

• both parents are involved
• the child has a good relationship with each parent
• the parents live close to each other
• the child can attend the same school or kindergarten
• the parents can exchange information
• there is no violence or serious threat
• there is no very strong conflict over every decision
• both parents have suitable housing conditions
• the custody plan is adapted to the child's age
• the child copes well with changing homes

Distance is particularly important. If the parents live close to each other, the child can have one school, the same friends, the same activities, and a similar daily rhythm. If the parents live far apart, shared custody can become exhausting for the child. Daily commuting, two sets of belongings, different rules in each home, stress from packing, and lack of stability may outweigh the parents' good intentions.

The child's age also matters. Custody of a teenager who can express their needs and understand the weekly rhythm is assessed differently than custody of a small child who needs a very predictable daily schedule.

When can shared custody be a bad idea?

Shared custody should not be treated as the default model for every family. There are situations where it may harm the child more than help.

It can be problematic when:

• parents are in a very intense conflict
• the child is drawn into the adults' dispute
• one parent does not respect the arrangements
• parents live far apart
• the child has emotional difficulties and struggles with changing homes
• one parent does not understand the child's needs
• there is violence
• there is addiction
• one parent seeks custody mainly to reduce child support
• there is no stable plan for school, treatment, and activities
• parents cannot make decisions on important matters concerning the child

In such situations, the court should focus not on theory but on real life. A model that looks good on paper may in practice mean tension, constant changes, lack of peace, and a feeling that the child must choose between parents.

If the conflict concerns not only the custody schedule but also making important decisions about the child, it is often necessary to simultaneously address the issue of parental authorityParental authority includes, among other things, decisions about school, treatment, trips, place of residence, and other important matters concerning the child.

Shared custody and divorce

Shared custody very often arises in divorce cases. If spouses have minor children, the divorce court must decide not only on the termination of the marriage. It is also necessary to determine how the child's life will look after the divorce.

In a case concerning divorce shared custody may appear as one element of a broader dispute. Parents may simultaneously argue about:

• fault for the breakdown of the marriage
• the child's place of residence
• contact rights
• maintenance
• parental authority
• housing
• division of property
• child-related costs
• security during the proceedings

In such a situation, it is easy to confuse all issues. One parent may use child support as an argument against shared custody. The other may use shared custody as an argument against child support. And in the middle is the child who needs peace.

Therefore, before filing a shared custody application, it is worth honestly answering several questions:

• does the child actually function well with both parents
• do the parents live close enough
• is the plan realistic given the parents' work
• will the child's school and activities suffer
• can the parents exchange information
• does each parent know the child's needs
• who will pay for fixed costs
• how will larger expenses be settled
• will child support be needed despite similar custody time

If the answers are unclear, it is better to prepare the case more thoroughly rather than assume that the mere term “shared custody” will resolve the conflict.

Shared custody in the announced changes for 2026

In 2026, the topic of shared custody and joint custody is additionally relevant due to announced changes in family law. The Ministry of Justice has informed about a family law package that includes, among other things, the topic of joint custody and a greater focus of family matters on the child's welfare. The official announcement can be found here: Family law package for the welfare of children - gov.pl.

It must be clearly stated, however: announcements of changes are not the same as binding regulations. In a specific case, the current legal status and the actual family situation must be verified. It is not advisable to base a claim or application solely on the fact that "now there should be shared custody." The court will still primarily consider the child's best interests and the parents' real circumstances.

In practice, even the best reform will not change one thing: child custody must work in real life. The child must have a place to sleep, a way to get to school, someone to pick them up from the doctor, someone to buy medicine, someone to help with homework, and someone to pay for extracurricular activities.

How to prepare for a conversation about shared custody?

The worst thing to do is to start with the slogan: "I want the child half and half." It is better to start with a concrete plan.

A good plan should answer the following questions:

• where the child will live during a given week
• who will take the child to school
• who will pick up the child
• where the child will keep clothes and school supplies
• how weekends will be arranged
• how holidays will be arranged
• how winter and summer vacations will be arranged
• who will pay for school, doctors, and activities
• how parents will make decisions
• how they will exchange information about the child
• what will happen if the child gets sick
• how will larger expenses be settled

The plan does not have to be perfect from day one, but it must be realistic. If a parent cannot answer basic organizational questions, the court may doubt whether shared custody is truly well thought out.

A well-prepared parent does not just say: "I am entitled to half the time." They demonstrate knowledge of how the child's life should look: school, doctors, transportation, personal belongings, rest, costs, and contact with the other parent.

What about the child's costs in shared custody?

In shared custody, the child's costs must be detailed even more precisely than in the classic model. Why? Because some expenses are borne individually by each parent at their home, but some remain joint or fixed.

Each parent can separately buy food, hygiene products, or items used in their own home. But it is still necessary to determine who pays for:

• school
• kindergarten
• tutoring
• medical treatment
• therapy
• extracurricular activities
• phone
• seasonal clothing
• school trips
• holidays
• larger purchases
• transport
• insurance
• documents

If parents do not agree on this beforehand, conflict will quickly return. One will buy winter boots and expect half the reimbursement. The other will say they did not consent. One will enroll the child in activities. The other will refuse to pay. One will cover medical treatment. The other will dispute the cost.

Therefore, child support in shared custody is not only a question of whether someone should pay a fixed monthly amount. It is also a question of how parents will share larger and fixed expenses.

In the initial cost calculation, the following may be helpful: child support calculatorIt does not resolve the case but helps to see which categories of expenses need to be considered at all.

The most important initial conclusion

Shared custody can be a good solution but should not be treated as a way to automatically avoid child support. The court should look at the child's real life, not just how the parents label their custody model.

The most important questions are:

• will the child have stability
• do the parents live close enough
• can the parents cooperate
• does each parent know the child's needs
• does the child handle such a rhythm well
• how will costs be divided
• are the parents' incomes similar
• is child support still necessary
• is the model not used merely as a financial argument

If shared custody is to work, it must be well thought out. If child support is to be reasonably determined, the child's costs must be calculated and the parents' situation compared. Only then can one speak of a solution that is not only convenient for adults but above all safe for the child.

What does the court consider in shared custody?

Shared custody is not granted because one parent strongly desires it or because it sounds modern. The court should verify whether such a model will be good for the child in the specific family. Not in theory, not on paper, but in everyday life.

The most important question is: will the child have stable, safe, and predictable conditions with both parents?

This means the court may consider many factors at once:

• the child's age
• the current care arrangement
• the child's relationship with each parent
• the distance between the parents' homes
• the school or kindergarten
• extracurricular activities
• the child's health
• the parents' availability
• housing conditions
• the level of conflict between the parents
• the parents' willingness to cooperate
• the manner of communication between the parents
• the risk of violence, addiction, or neglect
• the realistic division of the child's expenses

In family matters, it is not enough to say: “I am a good parent.” It is necessary to demonstrate that the proposed arrangement makes sense for the child. If a parent seeks shared custody, they should be able to explain how the child's week will look, who will take the child to school, who will attend medical appointments, who will pay for fixed costs, and how the parents will resolve daily issues.

The basic provisions regarding parental authority, child custody, and maintenance are found in the Family and Guardianship Code. In practice, the court should always refer to the child's best interests, not just the adults' expectations.

Previous child care

One of the most important questions is how care has been arranged so far. The court may verify whether the parent requesting shared custody has indeed been involved in the child's daily life.

Relevant issues may include:

• who took the child to school or kindergarten
• who picked up the child
• who attended meetings
• who scheduled medical appointments
• who helped with homework
• who bought clothes
• who paid for extracurricular activities
• who organized holidays and breaks
• who cared for the child during illness
• who knows the teachers, doctors, and the child's needs

If both parents have long been actively involved in the child's life, shared custody may appear more natural. The child is then accustomed to the presence of both parents, and each knows the child's daily rhythm, needs, and responsibilities.

The situation is different when one parent has appeared sporadically for years and only during a maintenance or divorce case suddenly demands half of the time. This does not automatically mean that such a parent cannot increase their involvement in care. However, the court may ask whether shared custody will immediately be safe and feasible for the child.

If a custody dispute arises during a divorce, it is advisable to prepare the entire case concerning divorce, as the court often considers the dissolution of the marriage, children, maintenance, and the future organization of family life simultaneously.

The child's age and needs

The child's age is highly significant. Care for a small child is assessed differently than for a school-age child or a teenager.

A small child usually needs a very stable daily routine. Sleep, meals, kindergarten, closeness, a sense of security, and predictability are very important. Frequent changes of home can be more difficult for such a child, especially if the parents are in conflict and unable to cooperate.

A school-age child has different needs. School, class schedule, commuting, extracurricular activities, friends, learning, rest, and weekly organization matter. Shared custody can work if the parents live close to each other and can maintain a similar routine.

A teenager may have their own opinion, greater independence, and specific needs. They may tolerate changing homes better but may not want to live according to a rigid schedule that suits the parents but not them. At an older age, friends, school, training, privacy, and a sense of control over one's life also become important.

There is no one-size-fits-all model for every age. The court should verify whether a specific child can cope with such a schedule and whether shared custody would not be an additional burden for them.

Distance between parents' homes

The distance between parents' homes can determine whether shared custody is feasible. If the parents live close to each other, the child can attend the same school, have the same friends, the same activities, and a similar daily routine.

If the parents live far apart, the matter becomes more complicated.

The court may consider:

• commute time to school
• commute time to activities
• distance from doctors
• distance from kindergarten
• possibility of picking up the child in an emergency
• transportation costs
• child's fatigue
• safety of commutes
• impact of commutes on learning and rest

A child should not spend their life in a car just because the parents want to formally have equal time. If commutes are long, shared custody may become too exhausting for the child.

The example is simple: one week with one parent and one week with the other can work when the parents live a few streets apart. The same model can be very difficult when they are separated by several dozen kilometers and the child must commute to school daily.

School, kindergarten, and extracurricular activities

Shared custody must fit the child's education. School and kindergarten are not just places the child goes to in the morning. It is the entire weekly rhythm: lessons, homework, contact with teachers, trips, meetings, friends, extracurricular activities, and responsibilities.

The court may verify:

• whether the child will attend the same school
• who will take and pick up the child
• who will communicate with the teachers
• who will help with homework
• who will keep track of deadlines
• whether the child will have school supplies in both homes
• can the parents exchange information
• how extracurricular activities will be managed
• who will pay for them
• who will transport the child to activities

Shared custody cannot mean that the child loses books every week, has no gym clothes, does not know at which parent's house they left their notebook, and the parents argue over every trip.

In practice, it is advisable to prepare a very specific plan: where the textbooks will be, whether the child has two sets of belongings, who manages the electronic journal, how parents exchange school information, and how costs are settled.

Living conditions at each parent's home

A parent seeking shared custody should have the conditions for real care of the child. This does not always mean a separate room and a perfect apartment. But the child should have a safe place to sleep, study, store belongings, and function normally.

The court may consider:

• place to sleep
• place to study
• hygienic conditions
• safety of the residence
• distance from school
• presence of other household members
• child's relationship with people in the home
• possibility to rest
• space for clothes, books, and personal items

If one parent lives in temporary conditions, with friends, without a place for the child, or in great chaos, shared custody may be difficult to justify. However, if the conditions are modest but stable and safe, this does not automatically disqualify the parent.

The most important thing is whether the child can live there normally, not just stay overnight.

Parents' working hours

Shared custody requires time. It cannot be performed only on paper. A parent must be available in the morning, after school, in the evening, during illness, for homework, doctors, and emergencies.

The court may consider:

• parent's working hours
• shift work
• business trips
• work abroad
• possibility of remote work
• flexible schedule
• availability in emergencies
• support from others
• actual presence at home

If a parent works from morning until late evening, often travels, or cannot pick up the child, the court may ask how such care is supposed to work in practice. It is not enough to say that "somehow it will work."

On the other hand, professional work itself does not exclude shared custody. Many parents work and take good care of their children. The key is whether the plan is realistic, not just ideal in declarations.

Communication between parents

Shared custody requires cooperation. Parents do not have to like each other. They do not have to have good private relations. But they must be able to talk about the child at a basic level.

This concerns matters such as:

• child's illness
• school
• homework
• medications
• extracurricular activities
• documents
• trips
• changes of plans
• emergencies
• costs
• information from teachers
• medical decisions

If parents cannot exchange a single calm message without an argument, shared custody may be very difficult for the child. The child will then live between two homes that do not share basic information.

It is not about parents being friends. It is about a minimal ability to cooperate. If every handover of the child ends in a quarrel, the child quickly begins to feel tension and responsibility for the adults' conflict.

In such situations, shared custody itself will not solve the problem. Sometimes it is first necessary to organize the rules of contact, parental authority, and decision-making methods.

Level of conflict between parents

Conflict does not always exclude shared custody but can make it very difficult. Many parents are in conflict after separation. This is normal. The question is whether the conflict mainly concerns the adults or directly destroys the child's life.

The court may look at whether the parents:

• insult each other in front of the child
• turn the child against the other parent
• hinder contact
• refuse to share information
• argue over every decision
• use the child as an intermediary
• threaten each other
• make conflicting accusations
• are able to carry out at least basic arrangements

If the conflict is intense, but the parents are still able to implement the care plan and protect the child from quarrels, the situation may differ from when the child is constantly drawn into the dispute.

The worst model is one in which the child moves weekly from one home to another, and each home tells them something contradictory: “it's bad at mom's,” “it's bad at dad's,” “tell the court you want to be with me.” This is not shared custody in the child's best interest. This is a conflict scheduled by a timetable.

Violence, addiction and the child's safety

If violence, addiction, threats, aggression, neglect or a real risk to the child appear in the family, shared custody requires great caution. It cannot be treated as a mere organizational dispute.

In such cases, safety must be the primary concern.

The following may be significant:

• police interventions
• Blue Card procedure
• medical documentation
• documents from a psychologist
• witness testimonies
• threatening messages
• alcohol abuse
• drug use
• aggression towards the child
• aggression towards the other parent
• neglect of care
• dangerous living conditions

If violence is a real problem, it is not worth hiding it under the slogan “we will agree for the child's good.” The child's welfare does not mean forcing them to stay in dangerous conditions. In such cases, legal assistance in threats and good evidence preparation becomes particularly important.

Official information on counteracting domestic violence and the Blue Card procedure can be found on government websites, including the gov.pl site concerning counteracting domestic violence.

Child's health and special needs

Not every child functions the same way. Some children require regular treatment, therapy, rehabilitation, ongoing medication, a special diet, psychological support or a very stable daily routine. With such needs, shared custody may be possible but requires even better preparation.

The court may verify:

• whether both parents know the doctors' recommendations
• who has so far been responsible for treatment
• who scheduled appointments
• who monitored medication
• whether the child requires therapy
• whether changing homes will disrupt treatment
• whether parents can exchange medical information
• whether both homes have appropriate conditions
• who bears the treatment costs

If the child has special needs, a general “week to week” plan may not suffice. It is necessary to show how parents will monitor therapy, medication, appointments and recommendations. Without this, shared custody may look like a nice model without practical support.

Child's opinion

The child's opinion may matter, but it must be approached cautiously. The child should not be put in a position where they must choose between mom and dad. This is a huge burden for many children.

An older child may have their own needs, daily schedule, activities, relationships with parents and a sense of where they feel safe. The court may consider this but should do so in a way that protects the child from pressure.

Parents should not:

• question the child about whom they want to live with
• record the child to have evidence
• persuade the child to give a specific answer
• show the child the statement of claim
• tell the child what to say in court
• to blame the child for the decision

The child has the right to their own emotions but should not be the judge in an adult conflict. If the case is difficult, the court may use the assistance of specialists to assess the child’s situation in a safer manner.

Does a parent have to have identical conditions as the other parent?

No. Parents do not have to have identical apartments, identical incomes, or identical lifestyles. That would be unrealistic. What matters is whether each of them can provide the child with safe, stable, and adequate conditions.

Differences between homes are normal. One parent may have a larger room, the other may live closer to school. One may have a garden, the other may live in an apartment block. One may have higher income, the other more time. The court should consider the whole picture.

The problem arises when the differences are so great that the child has normal conditions with one parent but lacks basic safety, a place to study, or stability with the other. Another issue may be when the lower income of one parent causes the child to live in two completely different standards. In such cases, the issue of child support may resurface despite shared custody.

How to prove that shared custody makes sense?

A parent seeking shared custody should prepare a specific plan and evidence showing that the model is feasible.

Helpful may be:

• a description of the current care
• the child’s weekly schedule
• distance from school
• housing conditions
• a plan for drop-offs and pick-ups
• information about the parent’s work
• evidence of involvement in school and medical treatment
• receipts of incurred expenses
• messages showing parental cooperation
• a proposal for cost sharing
• a plan for holidays, breaks, and vacations

A good application should not rely solely on the statement: “I love the child and want to have them half the time.” Love is important, but the court needs practical details. How will the child function from Monday to Friday? Who will take them to school? Who will pick them up from activities? What about illness? What about textbooks? What about costs? What about communication between parents?

If there are concrete answers to these questions, shared custody appears much more serious.

How to demonstrate that shared custody is not in the child’s interest?

The other parent may oppose shared custody but should do so specifically. Simply saying “I disagree” is insufficient. The court must know why such a model would be harmful to the child.

Arguments may concern, for example:

• great distance between homes
• lack of housing conditions
• lack of prior parental involvement
• unstable work schedule
• violence
• addiction
• intense conflict
• lack of communication
• child’s emotional problems
• difficulties at school
• frequent cancellations of contact
• lack of knowledge of the child’s needs
• using shared custody as an argument against child support

Such arguments must be supported by evidence. This may include messages, school documents, medical records, witness statements, evidence of cancelled contacts, intervention notes, or other materials.

It is best to avoid attacking for the sake of attack. Instead of writing: “the father is unfit for custody,” it is better to indicate: “the father fulfilled 6 out of 24 agreed contacts in the last 12 months, does not participate in medical visits, and is unaware of the child’s current therapeutic recommendations.”

Facts are stronger than opinions.

Shared custody as a provisional measure during the case

In some cases, a parent may wish to arrange custody already for the duration of the proceedings. Family cases can last a long time, and a child cannot function in chaos for many months.

The interim measure may concern, among other things, the child's place of residence, contacts, maintenance, or the manner of exercising custody until the case is concluded. In practice, it is about temporarily organizing the situation.

In shared custody, an interim measure may be considered when:

• the child is already living in such a model
• both parents are involved
• the plan is stable
• there is no threat to the child
• the existing arrangement needs to be formally regulated
• one party suddenly begins to block the existing custody

However, the court may also refuse if it considers that shared custody during the case would be too risky, chaotic, or contrary to the child's best interests.

In 2026, the topic of shared custody appears in the official announcements of the Ministry of Justice regarding the family law package. The Ministry pointed, among other things, to solutions concerning shared custody and its application in family cases. The current announcement can be checked on the Ministry of Justice.

How does the court view maintenance when assessing shared custody?

The court should separate two things: the custody model and the obligation to support the child. They are connected but not the same.

Shared custody answers the question of how the child will spend time with the parents. Maintenance answers the question of how the child's needs will be financed.

Therefore, even if the parents divide time similarly, it is still necessary to determine:

• what the child's costs are
• which costs each parent bears
• who pays for fixed costs
• are the parents' incomes similar
• whether the child has a similar standard of living in both homes
• whether settlements of larger expenses are needed
• whether one parent does not bear a significantly greater financial burden

Sometimes parents may agree that each finances the child at their own home, and larger costs are shared equally. Sometimes one parent will still pay maintenance because they earn significantly more or the other parent bears most of the fixed costs. Sometimes, instead of classic maintenance, a precise division of expenses will be key.

There is no one-size-fits-all solution. It depends on the child's specific situation.

What to prepare before a shared custody case?

Before the case, it is worth gathering not only arguments but also a plan. The court must see that the parent is not acting under the influence of emotions or a desire to reduce maintenance but has a real proposal for the child.

It is advisable to prepare:

• a custody schedule
• a description of previous involvement
• information about school and activities
• a plan for drop-offs and pick-ups
• documents concerning the child's costs
• a proposal for dividing expenses
• information about the parents’ incomes
• description of housing conditions
• evidence of communication with the other parent
• medical documents if the child has special needs
• a proposal for holidays, breaks, and vacations

If maintenance is involved in the case, it is worth calculating the child's costs in advance and checking child support calculator. This way, the discussion about money will not be based solely on emotions.

If the case is part of a broader family conflict, it may also be helpful to discuss the situation within family law, as shared custody often relates to divorce, maintenance, parental authority, and contacts.

Key conclusions from the court's assessment

The court should not choose shared custody just because it is fashionable. Nor should it reject it solely because the parents are separated. The most important are the facts.

The most important factors are:

• the child's welfare
• previous custody arrangements
• the child's relationship with the parents
• distance between homes
• school and daily routine
• the child's age
• health and special needs
• housing conditions
• parents' time
• communication between parents
• level of conflict
• child's safety
• actual cost sharing

Shared custody can work very well if it is thoughtful, calm, and tailored to the child. It can also become a source of chaos if it is forced, poorly prepared, or used as an argument in child support disputes.

Therefore, before the case, one should ask a simple question: does this model truly make life easier for the child, or only for the adults?

Child support in shared custody – is it necessary to pay?

The most common question regarding shared custody is: if the child spends a similar amount of time with each parent, is child support still necessary?

The answer is: it may be necessary.

Shared custody does not automatically eliminate child support. It may affect the amount, the way costs are settled, or the scope of each parent's obligations, but it does not mean that no one pays anything to anyone by default. Everything depends on the real situation of the child and the parents.

The three most important things are:

• the child's needs
• the parents' financial capabilities
• the actual division of costs

If the parents have similar incomes, the child spends a similar amount of time with each, and costs are shared reasonably, child support may not be necessary in the traditional form. Parents may agree that each supports the child while in their care, and larger expenses are split equally.

However, if one parent earns significantly more and the other has lower income, child support may still be justified. The goal is to ensure the child's needs are met and that the child enjoys a comparable standard of living with both parents.

The basic principle stems from art. 135 of the Family and Guardianship Code. Child support depends on the justified needs of the child and the earning and financial capacity of the obligated parent. The official text of the statute is available at ISAP.

Why equal custody does not always mean equal costs?

On paper, it may seem simple: the child spends one week with one parent and one week with the other, so each pays for the child while in their care. In practice, it is not that straightforward.

Some costs are indeed borne by each parent in their own home. This includes, for example, food, daily hygiene products, laundry, electricity, water, or minor expenses. But many costs do not split themselves.

Such costs include, among others:

• school
• kindergarten
• tutoring
• therapy
• medical treatment
• medications
• glasses
• orthodontic braces
• extracurricular activities
• phone
• insurance
• school trips
• seasonal clothing
• shoes
• sports equipment
• holidays
• school breaks
• larger educational purchases

If the parents do not agree on who and how pays for such items, conflict will quickly return. One parent buys a winter jacket and expects half the cost reimbursed. The other says they did not agree to the purchase. One pays for tutoring. The other claims it is unnecessary. One pays for the dentist. The other says they could have used public health services.

Therefore, with shared custody, it is necessary to discuss not only how many days the child spends in each home but also how the child's larger and ongoing needs are financed.

When can child support be justified in shared custody?

Child support may be justified even in shared custody if, without it, the child's needs are not realistically met or if the financial burden is unevenly distributed.

This may be the case, for example, when:

• one parent earns significantly more
• one parent bears most of the fixed costs
• one parent pays for school, medical treatment, or activities
• the child has special health needs
• the other parent does not contribute to major expenses
• custody is not actually equal
• one parent has a much higher standard of living
• the child has good conditions with one parent, while the other lacks money for basic needs
• the shared custody model is mainly used to reduce child support payments

Example: the child spends one week with the mother and one week with the father. The mother earns 4500 PLN net, the father earns 18000 PLN net. The mother pays for most clothes, medicines, school fees, and tutoring. The father buys food when the child is with him but does not participate in larger costs. In such a situation, the phrase “equal custody” alone does not solve the problem. Child support or another clear cost-sharing mechanism may be necessary.

Second example: parents earn similarly, live close to each other, the child spends equal time with both, and school, medical, and activity costs are split equally. In this case, traditional child support may be less necessary because each parent effectively finances the child to a comparable extent.

The most important thing is that the court looks at the specifics. It is not enough to say: “custody is shared, so there will be no child support.”

When can child support be lower?

Shared custody can lead to lower child support if the parent obligated to pay actually bears a large part of the child’s costs directly. If the child spends significant time with that parent, and the parent buys food, clothes, pays for activities, drives to school, visits doctors, and incurs real expenses, the court may take this into account.

Child support may be lower when:

• the child spends a similar amount of time with each parent
• parents have similar incomes
• current costs are actually borne by both
• larger expenses are shared
• no parent bears a clearly greater burden
• the child has good conditions with both parents
• there are no large differences in the standard of living
• parents can settle expenses without constant disputes

However, this does not mean that child support will always drop to zero. Sometimes a lower amount is fairer than no support at all, especially when there is a large income disparity between the parents.

In child support cases, it is also very important that the obligation does not consist solely of mathematically splitting costs in half. The court considers the child’s needs and the parents’ capabilities. If one parent has much greater means, they may be required to contribute more financially.

Is it possible to agree that no one pays child support?

It is possible to try to agree on this, but it is not always a good solution. If parents truly share custody, earn similarly, and can settle the child’s costs, the absence of traditional child support may work. Then parents can agree that each bears the costs of the child while with them, and larger expenses are divided according to a set rule.

Example of such a solution:

• each parent buys food and daily necessities when the child is with them
• school costs are split equally
• medical costs are split equally
• extra activities are split equally if both parents have agreed to them
• seasonal clothing is settled by agreement
• vacations are financed individually by each parent unless otherwise agreed

However, this model requires cooperation. If parents are in conflict and cannot agree on basic expenses, the lack of child support may lead to ongoing disputes.

In practice, sometimes it is better to set a fixed child support amount plus rules for sharing larger costs. This way, the parent who incurs regular expenses has predictable funds, and larger expenses can be settled separately.

Child support and income differences between parents

Income disparity is one of the most important issues in shared custody. If parents earn similarly, it is easier to assume that each can finance the child in their home. However, if one parent earns several times more, the situation is different.

The child should not experience an extreme difference in standard of living just because the parents have formally divided custody time. If the child has a separate room, activities, good food, vacations, and all needs met with one parent, but the other constantly lacks funds for basic expenses, the question arises whether child support is still necessary.

The court may consider:

• each parent’s income
• earning capacity
• property
• cost of living
• obligations
• standard of living
• actual costs incurred for the child
• whether the child has similar conditions in both homes

The point is not to equalize the parents' lives. It is about the child. Child support is meant to secure the child's needs, not to serve as a settlement between adults.

Earning capacity, not just salary

In maintenance cases, it matters not only how much the parent currently earns. Earning and asset potential are important. This is especially relevant when a parent formally reports low income but their situation indicates they can earn more.

The court may consider:

• education
• professional experience
• profession
• previous earnings
• health condition
• possibility of taking up employment
• business activity
• property
• lifestyle
• work abroad
• additional sources of income

Example: a parent worked for years as a specialist earning high amounts but suddenly starts showing minimal income before the maintenance case without clear reason. The court may examine whether this is a real change in circumstances or an attempt to reduce maintenance.

The same applies to business activity. Low income on documents does not always mean inability to pay maintenance. Sometimes the company has high revenues, the parent lives well, but formally reports little. Then a broader view is needed.

Fixed costs of the child in shared custody

In shared custody, the most disputes arise over costs that cannot be easily assigned to one home. These should be described most precisely.

Fixed costs may include:

• kindergarten
• school
• school lunches
• tutoring
• medical treatment
• therapy
• medications
• extracurricular activities
• phone
• internet
• insurance
• transport
• learning equipment
• sports
• culture
• recreation

It is worth establishing which expenses are shared, which each parent bears separately, and which require prior consent.

Without such rules, parents often argue over every larger payment. One enrolls the child in English classes, the other refuses to contribute. One buys new sports shoes, the other claims they were unnecessary. One pays privately for a doctor, the other says they could have waited for a public appointment.

Therefore, in shared custody cases, it is advisable to prepare not only a schedule of days but also a cost plan.

How to calculate the child's costs?

Child costs are best itemized in simple categories. There is no need to create complicated accounting, but the summary should be clear.

Sample categories:

• food
• clothing and shoes
• housing and utilities
• school or kindergarten
• medical treatment
• medications
• tutoring
• extracurricular activities
• transport
• phone
• recreation
• seasonal costs
• other justified needs

In shared custody, it is worth indicating for each item who actually bears it. This helps to see whether costs are truly divided or only the care time is similar.

Example:

• food - each parent bears during their week
• school - paid by mother
• tutoring - paid by mother
• phone - paid by father
• medical treatment - parents split equally
• seasonal clothing - disputed
• holidays - each finances their own trip

Such a breakdown immediately shows where the problems lie. It may turn out that formally the child is with both parents equally, but most of the costs are borne by one person.

For the initial organization of expenses, child support calculatorThe result does not replace a court decision but helps to see the real categories of costs and prepare the discussion about child support.

Do expenses need to be documented?

Yes, especially if there is a dispute between the parents. The court does not have to take at face value that the child costs a specific amount. The better the expenses are documented, the easier it is to show that the claim for child support or a specific division of costs makes sense.

Useful documents may include:

• invoices
• receipts
• transfer confirmations
• contracts with the school or kindergarten
• treatment invoices
• confirmations of extracurricular activities
• medical documentation
• certificates from the school
• proof of textbook purchases
• payment history
• correspondence between parents about expenses

It is not necessary to have proof for every roll or small item. But for larger costs, it is worth having documents. Especially for treatment, therapy, tutoring, extracurricular activities, kindergarten, holidays, and larger purchases.

If a parent wants to show that they bear most of the costs, words alone may not suffice. Transfer confirmations and invoices are much stronger.

Child support and personal care of the child

Child support involves more than just money. The Family and Guardianship Code provides that the fulfillment of the maintenance obligation towards the child may also consist of personal efforts to maintain or raise the child. The official text of the statute can be checked at ISAP.

This means the court may consider who actually takes care of the child. Daily care involves work, time, and responsibility.

In practice, this includes, among others:

• preparing meals
• taking the child to school
• helping with homework
• scheduling doctors' appointments
• monitoring medication
• laundry
• shopping
• organizing activities
• care during illness
• talks with teachers
• caring for the child's emotions

In the classic model, where the child mainly lives with one parent, that parent often performs most of the personal efforts. The other should then participate more financially.

In shared custody, personal efforts may be more evenly distributed. But again—only if such care is real. If the child is formally supposed to be with each parent half the time, but in practice one parent still organizes school, doctors, activities, and most costs, the court may take this into account.

How to settle larger expenses?

In shared custody, larger expenses are very important. They most often cause conflict because they do not occur monthly but can be high.

These include, for example:

• orthodontic treatment
• glasses
• computer for learning
• summer camp
• sports camp
• bicycle
• larger school supplies
• specialized shoes
• sports equipment
• therapy
• private medical tests
• school trip

It is best to establish the rules in advance. It can be assumed that larger expenses are split equally after prior agreement. A different percentage can also be set if the parents' incomes differ significantly.

Example:

• the mother covers 40 percent of the larger expenses
• the father covers 60 percent of the larger expenses
• expenses above a specified amount require prior notification of the other parent
• urgent health expenses are settled upon presentation of the invoice

Such rules reduce the risk of disputes. The child should not lose therapy, treatment, or activities simply because the parents have not agreed on the payment method.

Can one parent pay child support while costs are still shared?

Yes, this is possible. Child support and the division of additional costs can operate concurrently.

Example: one parent pays child support monthly in a specified amount, and in addition, the parents split the costs of treatment, therapy, major trips, or extracurricular activities equally. This solution may make sense when regular child support covers the child's basic needs but does not include large, irregular expenses.

It is also possible to agree that child support is lower, but the obligated parent covers certain costs directly, such as school, phone, or sports activities. It is important that such an arrangement is clear and feasible.

Imprecise arrangements lead to conflicts. If parents only say “we will share larger expenses,” questions quickly arise about which expenses are considered larger, whether they needed to be agreed upon, and who should pay first.

Child support in shared custody and parental conflict

The greater the conflict, the more important clear financial rules are. If parents can communicate, many matters can be settled on an ongoing basis. If every payment ends in an argument, it is better to have precise provisions.

In case of conflict, it is advisable to establish:

• whether child support will be paid monthly
• by which day of the month
• to which account
• who pays for school
• who pays for medical treatment
• who pays for extracurricular activities
• how larger expenses are settled
• which expenses require consent
• how urgent costs are handled
• how parents document expenses

This may sound dry, but in practice it helps greatly. The fewer ambiguities, the fewer opportunities for further disputes.

The child should not hear that “mom didn’t pay for the shoes” or “dad didn’t pay for the doctor.” These are adult matters. Well-defined child support and costs help relieve the child from the burden of conflict.

Can shared custody be illusory?

Yes. This is a common problem.

Shared custody may be illusory when a parent formally demands half the time but in practice:

• does not regularly pick up the child
• leaves the child in the care of others
• does not participate in school
• does not know the doctors
• does not bear costs
• does not have suitable living conditions
• cannot organize the child's week
• does not follow the agreed schedule
• is interested in the child mainly in the context of child support

If the other parent suspects that the shared custody request is filed only to avoid child support, facts must be shown. It is not enough to write: “he just wants to pay less.” It is better to demonstrate the previous involvement, who actually cared for the child, and what costs each parent bore.

On the other hand, it cannot be assumed that every parent requesting shared custody does so for financial reasons. Sometimes a parent genuinely wants to be present in the child's life and has the means to do so. Therefore, the court should assess the evidence, not mere suspicions.

How to prepare a position in a child support case?

In shared custody cases, the child support position should be very specific. It is necessary to show how the custody time is divided and what the costs look like.

It is advisable to prepare:

• monthly summary of the child's expenses
• information on who bears which costs
• evidence of expenses
• information about the parents’ incomes
• description of each parent's personal care
• larger and seasonal costs
• proposal for cost division
• arguments why child support is or is not necessary

If a parent wants child support despite shared custody, they should demonstrate why it is needed. For example, because they earn significantly less, bear most of the fixed costs, or the child has needs not covered by the other parent.

If a parent seeks a reduction or elimination of child support, they should show that they actually bear the child's costs and that the child's needs are met in both homes.

The worst are general statements. "It is not due because custody is split equally" or "It is due because there have always been child support payments" is insufficient. Numbers, evidence, and a real division of responsibilities must be shown.

Examples of cost settlement models

In practice, various settlement models can be encountered. Each has its pros and cons.

First model: each parent supports the child at their own home, and larger expenses are split equally. This can work with similar incomes and good communication.

Second model: one parent pays lower child support, and larger costs are divided separately. This can work when parents' incomes differ but custody is genuinely broadly shared.

Third model: one parent pays child support because they earn significantly more or the other bears most fixed costs. This may be necessary if the absence of child support would be detrimental to the child.

Fourth model: parents divide expenses proportionally according to their incomes. For example, one covers 60 percent, the other 40 percent of larger costs. This may be fairer than an equal split if income differences are significant.

There is no single ideal model. The best one is that which protects the child and minimizes conflicts.

Key conclusions on child support in shared custody cases

Shared custody does not automatically mean no child support. It may change the way the child is financed but does not remove the parents' obligation to bear the costs of the child's maintenance.

The most important questions are:

• what are the actual costs of the child
• who bears the fixed costs
• who pays for larger expenses
• are the parents' incomes similar
• whether the child has a similar standard of living in both homes
• is shared custody actual or only formal
• is child support still necessary
• can the parents settle costs without constant conflict

If parents want to avoid disputes, they should prepare not only a custody schedule but also a clear plan for financing the child. The child needs not only time with the parents but also money for daily life, school, medical care, development, and recreation.

Securing custody and child support during the case

Family cases can last a long time. For adults, this is stress and uncertainty, but for the child, it is often several months of life in suspension. Therefore, in some cases, it is necessary to consider securing measures already during the proceedings.

Security may concern, among others:

• the child's place of residence
• contacts with the other parent
• the manner of exercising custody
• child support
• prohibition of certain behaviors
• urgent matters related to the child's safety

In shared custody, security measures may make sense when the child already functions in such a model and the situation only needs to be formally arranged. It may also arise when one parent suddenly restricts the other's contact, despite custody previously being genuinely shared.

Securing child support is important when one parent does not pay, pays irregularly, or shifts most costs to the other party. Even if ultimately the parents will discuss shared custody, the child needs funds on an ongoing basis: for food, school, medical care, clothing, transportation, and daily life.

The basic principles of securing proceedings are found in the Code of Civil ProcedureIn family matters, provisional measures often have a very practical significance, as they allow for organizing the child's situation before a final decision is made.

When might provisional measures be necessary?

It is worth considering provisional measures when, without a swift court decision, the child or parent is left in chaos. This particularly applies to situations where parents are temporarily unable to establish basic rules.

Provisional measures may be necessary when:

• the other parent refuses to release the child
• previous contact has been suddenly cut off
• parents argue over every appointment
• one parent has moved out with the child without arrangements
• the other parent does not pay for the child
• the child’s maintenance costs are not secured
• there is a risk of violence or neglect
• one parent wants to organize existing shared custody
• the child lives in an unstable routine
• parents are unable to agree on a plan until the judgment

The application for provisional measures should be specific. It is not enough to write, "I request shared custody" or "I request child support." It is necessary to show what the plan should look like, why it is needed, and what facts justify it.

When it comes to child support, it is advisable to prepare the child's expenses immediately. Helpful may be child support calculator, as it allows for organizing expenses before the parent enters a specific amount in the application.

Common mistakes in shared custody

Shared custody can work well, but only when it is well thought out. The biggest problems arise when parents treat it as a slogan rather than as the daily organization of the child's life.

Mistake 1: treating shared custody as a way to avoid child support

This is one of the most common mistakes. A parent says: "I want the child half the time, so I will not pay child support." The court may then verify whether there is a genuine readiness to care for the child behind this application or mainly a financial argument.

Shared custody should not be a tool to reduce costs. If a parent truly wants such a model, they should present the child's daily schedule, living conditions, involvement in school and medical care, cost-sharing method, and willingness to cooperate.

Mistake 2: lack of a cost plan

Parents agree that the child will spend one week with one parent and one week with the other, but they do not determine who pays for school, medical care, activities, clothing, holidays, and larger expenses. The conflict returns after the first invoice.

In shared custody, it is necessary to agree not only on time but also on money. If the child is to attend tutoring, therapy, or sports, parents should know who pays and in what proportion.

Mistake 3: too general a schedule

The statement "the child will spend half the time with each parent" is not specific enough. It is necessary to specify when the week starts and ends, who picks up the child, where belongings are exchanged, what happens during holidays, breaks, vacations, and illness.

The greater the conflict, the more precise the plan should be.

Mistake 4: ignoring school and transportation

The child should not pay for the parents' conflict with daily fatigue. If shared custody involves long commutes, losing belongings, lack of a stable routine, and school problems, the court may have serious doubts.

School, kindergarten, doctors, and extracurricular activities must realistically be compatible with such a model.

Mistake 5: assuming the child will "somehow get used to it"

Not every child copes well with changing homes every few days or every week. Some children adapt to such a rhythm, others react with stress, sleep problems, learning difficulties, or emotional tension.

The child should not be an experiment. If parents want shared custody, they must consider the child's reactions, age, needs, and sense of security.

Mistake 6: involving the child in the conflict

Questions like "tell me who you want to live with" or "tell the court you want to be with me" are very burdensome for the child. The child should not choose a parent or be responsible for adult decisions.

Parents may have different positions, but the child should not be a messenger, witness, or tool of pressure.

Mistake 7: ignoring violence or addiction

If there is violence, addiction, aggression, or a real threat in the family, shared custody requires particular caution. In such cases, the child's safety is more important than equal parental time.

In such situations, it is advisable to seek help sooner. Cases involving domestic violence require proper evidence preparation and appropriate protective measures. One can start with information on the website domestic violence and official government materials about counteracting domestic violence.

How to properly prepare a case for shared custody?

A good case for shared custody is not based solely on emotions. It is necessary to demonstrate that the proposed model is realistic, safe, and beneficial for the child.

It is advisable to prepare:

• a description of the current care
• child's weekly schedule
• pickup and drop-off timetable
• information about the school or kindergarten
• information about extracurricular activities
• description of housing conditions
• information about the parents' work
• a plan for holidays, breaks, and vacations
• the manner of communication between the parents
• method of cost settlement
• documents concerning the child's health
• evidence of the parent's involvement
• proposal for child support or division of expenses

If a parent wants shared custody, they should be able to answer simple, practical questions:

• who picks up the child from school
• where the child does homework
• where the child keeps textbooks
• who accompanies the child to the doctor
• who buys seasonal clothing
• who pays for activities
• how parents inform each other about illness
• what happens if one parent cannot fulfill custody duties
• how the child spends holidays and vacations

Such a plan shows that the parent is thinking about the child, not just about the formal division of time.

How to prepare if the other parent demands shared custody?

If the other parent demands shared custody and you believe this model will not be good for the child, it is not enough to say "I disagree." You must show why.

Arguments should concern the child, not just the conflict between adults.

Examples may include:

• lack of prior involvement of the other parent
• great distance between homes
• unstable living conditions
• work preventing daily care
• lack of contact with school or doctors
• child's problems after visits
• violence or addiction
• lack of communication between parents
• using the child in the conflict
• risk of chaos in learning and activities

It is best to rely on facts and evidence. If the other parent canceled visits for a year, it is worth showing messages. If they were not interested in the school, it is possible to indicate who actually contacted the teachers. If the child requires therapy, it is worth showing documents and recommendations.

The court should not decide the case based on mutual accusations. It needs specifics.

How to discuss costs with the other parent?

With shared custody, it is advisable to clarify costs as clearly as possible. There is no need to assume bad faith immediately, but misunderstandings should be avoided.

It is worth agreeing on:

• who pays for school or kindergarten
• who pays for tutoring
• who pays for medical treatment
• who pays for medication
• who buys clothes
• who covers the costs of extracurricular activities
• how are holidays and school breaks divided
• how larger expenses are settled
• which costs require prior consent
• is a fixed amount of child support necessary
• will larger costs be divided proportionally

If the parents have similar incomes, often splitting larger costs equally works well. If the income difference is significant, a proportional division, for example 60 percent and 40 percent, may be fairer.

The most important thing is that the child does not suffer due to adult disputes. Medical treatment, school, activities, and daily needs should not depend on whether the parents are currently in conflict.

Is it worth concluding a parenting agreement?

A parenting agreement can be very helpful if the parents are able to communicate. It is a document that organizes custody, contact, costs, and decision-making after separation.

A good agreement may include:

• a custody schedule
• the place of child handover
• holidays
• school breaks
• holidays
• birthdays
• telephone contact
• school
• medical treatment
• extracurricular activities
• foreign trips
• cost division
• method of informing about important matters concerning the child
• dispute resolution rules

In shared custody, the agreement should be very specific. The general statement “parents will cooperate” sounds good but offers little when the first conflict arises.

A practical clause may look like this:

“Parents will split 50/50 the costs of extracurricular activities that have been previously agreed upon via email or SMS.”

Or:

“In case of the child’s illness, the parent with whom the child currently stays will promptly inform the other parent about the health condition, medical recommendations, and purchased medications.”

Such details can save many arguments.

Shared custody and parental authority

Shared custody is not the same as parental authority. Parents can divide caregiving time but still must make important decisions regarding the child. If they cannot do this, the schedule alone will not solve the problem.

Parental authority includes, among others:

• school choice
• medical treatment
• therapy
• foreign trips
• documents
• place of residence
• important educational matters

If parents have full parental authority, they should jointly decide on the most important matters concerning the child. If one parent blocks decisions, harms the child’s interests, or is indifferent to their needs, a dispute over the scope may arise. parental authority.

Good communication is especially important in shared custody. The child lives in two homes but should not have two completely conflicting decision-making systems.

FAQ - shared custody and child support

Is child support required with shared custody?

It can be. Shared custody does not automatically exclude child support. The court considers the child’s needs, parents’ capabilities, and the actual division of costs. If one parent earns significantly more or incurs fewer costs, child support may still be justified.

Does shared custody always mean no child support?

No. That is a myth. No child support may make sense when parents have similar incomes, genuinely share custody, and reasonably settle the child’s expenses. In many cases, child support or division of larger expenses remains necessary.

Can child support be lower with shared custody?

Yes. If a parent actually provides extensive care and directly bears a large part of the child’s costs, this may affect the amount of child support. However, this does not automatically mean a reduction to zero.

What does the court consider in shared custody?

The court may consider the child’s welfare, age, school, distance between homes, living conditions, prior care, parents’ communication, level of conflict, child’s safety, and the real division of costs.

Is shared custody possible amid parental conflict?

Conflict does not always exclude it but can greatly hinder it. If parents cannot exchange basic information, argue in front of the child, and block each other’s decisions, shared custody may not serve the child’s best interests.

Does the child need two separate rooms?

The child does not always need identical conditions at both parents’ homes but should have a safe place to sleep, study, rest, and store belongings. The conditions should allow normal functioning, not just occasional overnight stays.

Is the cost always split 50/50 in shared custody?

Not always. A 50/50 split may make sense when incomes and the scope of care are similar. If the parents’ incomes differ significantly, a different cost division or child support may be fairer.

Can shared custody be arranged for the duration of the case?

In some situations, it is possible to request a temporary custody arrangement for the duration of the proceedings. Everything depends on the child’s best interests, previous care, safety, and the parents’ actual circumstances.

Can shared custody be established during a divorce?

Yes, the issue of shared custody may arise in a divorce case if the spouses have a minor child. The court must then determine how custody, child support, visitation, and the child’s most important matters will be arranged after the divorce. divorceWhat if the other parent wants shared custody only to avoid paying child support?

You need to present facts. Important will be the parent’s previous involvement, actual care, living conditions, contribution to the child’s expenses, knowledge of the child’s needs, and whether the proposed arrangement truly serves the child’s interests.

Summary – shared custody and child support

Shared custody can be a good solution, but only if it is tailored to the child, not the parents’ ambitions. It is not about mathematically splitting the child in half. It is about arranging custody so the child has stability, safety, contact with both parents, and secured needs.

Child support in shared custody cases must be assessed reasonably. Sometimes it will not be needed in the classic form. Sometimes it will be lower. Sometimes it will still be necessary, especially if one parent earns much more, bears fewer costs, or the child has special needs.

The most important thing is to calculate the real costs of the child and check how they are borne. Time spent caring is one thing. Money for school, medical treatment, activities, clothing, transport, and daily needs is another.

Before the case, it is advisable to prepare:

a custody plan

• information about the school and commuting
• the child’s weekly schedule
• evidence of previous involvement
• description of housing conditions
• documents concerning the child’s health and education
• a summary of the child's costs
• a proposal for dividing expenses
• information about the parents’ incomes
• arguments regarding the child’s best interests
• If the case is contested, it is not worth acting on slogans. Simply saying “I want shared custody” or “I don’t want shared custody” is not enough. You must show the court what the child’s life really looks like and which arrangement will be safest for them.

In more difficult cases, especially when shared custody is combined with child support, divorce, disputes over parental authority, or violence, it is advisable to seek legal assistance. You can start by describing the situation to the Syndykat Prawniczy side, indicating whether the issue concerns shared custody, child support, divorce, child safety, or urgent protection.

SYNDYKAT PRAWNICZY » Shared custody and child support in 2026 – what does the court consider? Channel with comments contactShared custody and child support – check whether child support must be paid in shared custody, what the court considers, and how to prepare your case.